Using MECIR standards in developing and evaluating Cochrane Reviews of interventions

Topic category Editorial processes and supporting review authors
Date and Location
Date: 
Monday 1 October 2012 - 13:30 - 15:00
Location: 
Contact persons and facilitators
Contact person Affiliation Country
Toby Lasserson (Contact this person) Cochrane Editorial Unit United Kingdom
Facilitator Affiliation Country
Jackie Chandler Cochrane Editorial Unit United Kingdom
Toby Lasserson Cochrane Editorial Unit United Kingdom
David Tovey Cochrane Editorial Unit United Kingdom
Other contributors
First nameLast nameAffiliation and Country
First name: 
Rachel
Last name: 
Churchill
Affiliation and Country: 
Cochrane Depression, Anxiety & Neurosis Group,UK
First name: 
Julian
Last name: 
Higgins
Affiliation and Country: 
MRC Biostatistics Unit, UK
First name: 
Miranda
Last name: 
Cumpston
Affiliation and Country: 
Cochrane Training Co-ordinator, Australia
Target audience
Target audience: 
Cochrane Review Group editorial base staff, review authors, Cochrane editors
Is your workshop restricted to a specific audience or open to all Colloquium participants?: 
Open
Level of knowledge required: 
Any
Type of workshop
Type of workshop: 
Training
Abstract text
Abstract: 
Objectives:
To provide participants with practical guidance on using Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Review (MECIR) standards in conducting, writing and editing Cochrane Reviews.

Description:
This workshop will focus on the application of the MECIR standards. Participants will be encouraged to draw on their own experience of review or editorial processes. The workshop will comprise three parts:
• A background presentation on the development of the current set of conduct and reporting standards.
• Practical small group exercises involving the use of standards. The exercise will involve discussion of various sections of text from Cochrane Reviews. The groups will be given examples where the optimal approach to review conduct and reporting are well-established, as well as areas where there is less consensus and more than one approach is justifiable.
• A discussion of strategies to improve uptake and familiarity with the standards and consider different ways in which they can be applied in developing and evaluating reviews.  

We intend that participants will gain knowledge of the standards and how they can be incorporated in to the development or evaluation of reviews. The facilitators will also use this session as a feedback forum on the application of the standards.